Isn't This All a Hoax or Hallucinations??by Michael WilleyMany assert that the bigfoot/sasquatch is merely the product of over-active imaginations and cunning hoaxers. However, published accounts of sightings of a hairy, bipedal creature date from the 1840s, while Native American and First Nation accounts date back centuries. Sightings have been reported in Tennessee and in every other state in the Union, except Hawaii, and, in a majority of the Canadian provinces. Sightings have been reported by a broad spectrum of humanity, ranging from housewives to law enforcement officers to experienced, seasoned hunters, loggers and other outdoorsmen. It is highly unlikely that all those sightings are the result of either imagination or an elaborate, nationwide hoax. Further, reports submitted by trained observers and seasoned outdoorsmen are especially helpful when dealing with the contention that many bigfoot sightings are the result of over-active imaginations and/or mis-identified bears. In addition to actual sightings, there is a wealth of physical evidence that points to the existence of sasquatch in North America. For example, literally thousands of footprint casts have been collected over the years. Could some of those footprints have been faked? Undoubtedly. Are all of those footprints fake? Highly unlikely. Why? Because all primates have dermal ridges (i.e., finger prints) on both hands and feet, and many of the plaster casts of bigfoot footprints reveal dermal ridges on the bottom of the foot. Further, many of the plaster casts reveal movement in the toes and the foot from stride to stride. Both dermal ridges and toe movement are difficult, if not impossible, to fake. We believe the following quote to be an accurate appraisal of the possibility that all bigfoot evidence in existence is the result of a hoax:
If you're still thinking, "It's all a hoax!" then consider this:
One must either believe that every sighting, every footprint, every recorded vocalization, every sample of hair and scat, in short, every shred of evidence, is the product of an elaborate, international, centuries spanning conspiracy and hoax, or one must believe that the largest of the great apes is walking the forests of North America, unrecognized and uncollected by science. A much greater leap of faith is required to believe the former than the latter. Top of Page | |